Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- From: Christoph.Weber at first.fraunhofer.de (Christoph Weber)
- Date: Fri Oct 10 11:40:02 2008
- In-reply-to: <14791e30810090725i702ded18gf548d53abb9beeee@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <4FA912B7D4D8468FBACF5B5DDE198385@AHARDPLACE><48EE12A8.8020908@inria.fr> <14791e30810090725i702ded18gf548d53abb9beeee@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you for the advice, it worked under the Helium release. After searching the ACSL_1.3 PDF i found the \separated(...) function. My question is if its posible to use it in a following manner : /*@ requires \separated(a, b); */ void array_cpy(int* a, int n, int* b); or do i have to be more specific, say like this: /*@ requires \forall int i,j; \separated(a[i] b[j]); */ void array_cpy(int* a, int n, int* b); Christoph ----- Original Message ----- From: Yannick Moy To: Claude March? Cc: frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 4:25 PM Subject: Re: [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples Just a precision: With the next version of Frama-C, the separation of pointers into different regions is automatic (unless you prevent it with an option), so that your pointer parameters [a] and [b] belong indeed to different heap regions. Then, your code is proved right away. You may try option [-jc-opt -separation] to try it on the current version. Then, you will get PO at function call to prove these regions are indeed separated if the tool cannot figure it alone. -- Yannick On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Claude March? <Claude.Marche@inria.fr> wrote: Christoph Weber wrote: #2: in the second example the preservation of the loop invariant wont work /*@ requires 0 < n; requires \valid_range(a, 0, n-1) && \valid_range(b, 0, n-1); ensures \forall int k; 0 <= k < n ==> a[k] == b[k]; */ void array_cpy(int* a, int n, int* b){ /*@ loop invariant 0 <= i <= n && \forall int m; 0 <= m < i ==> a[m] == b[m]; */ for(int i = 0;i< n;i++){ a[i]=b[i]; } } What am I missing, to get the examples running? You must take into account the fact that arrays a and b might overlap, such as if you call array_cpy as array_cpy(t,10,t+1); in such a case your spec does not hold I think. - Claude -- Claude March? | tel: +33 1 72 92 59 69 INRIA Saclay - ?le-de-France | mobile: +33 6 33 14 57 93 Parc Orsay Universit? | fax: +33 1 74 85 42 29 4, rue Jacques Monod - B?timent N | http://www.lri.fr/~marche/ F-91893 ORSAY Cedex | _______________________________________________ Frama-c-discuss mailing list Frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss -- Yannick ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Frama-c-discuss mailing list Frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20081010/9de27eb9/attachment.htm
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- From: yannick.moy at gmail.com (Yannick Moy)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- From: virgile.prevosto at cea.fr (Virgile Prevosto)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- From: Christoph.Weber at first.fraunhofer.de (Christoph Weber)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marché)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- From: yannick.moy at gmail.com (Yannick Moy)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Re: [Why-discuss] Questions about Frama-C
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] [Fwd: [Why-discuss] Problem with program states in Frama-C]
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples
- Index(es):