Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Collisions using //@ or /*@
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Collisions using //@ or /*@
- From: virgile.prevosto at cea.fr (Virgile Prevosto)
- Date: Mon Oct 27 15:59:31 2008
- In-reply-to: <OFE86315BC.378D1128-ONC12574E8.00489D32-C12574E8.004964E4@hispano-suiza-sa.com>
- References: <OFE86315BC.378D1128-ONC12574E8.00489D32-C12574E8.004964E4@hispano-suiza-sa.com>
Hello, Le lun 20 oct 2008 15:21:43 CEST, <jean-baptiste.jeannin@hispano-suiza-sa.com> a ?crit : > Some JavaDoc-like documentation tools can badly interfere with Frama-C by > also requiring special comments beginning by /*@ or //@. For example, the > Do you have any idea of how to go around this problem? Are the /*@ and //@ > syntaxes, which were already used by JML, supposed to somehow be In the current version of Frama-C (and in the forthcoming release), the only way to overcome this issue is to disable annotation processing entirely (with the -no-annot option). The '@' sign was indeed chosen to introduce ACSL annotation because it was already used by JML (while javadoc and doxygen use '*' for structured documentation). Best regards, -- E tutto per oggi, a la prossima volta. Virgile
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Collisions using //@ or /*@
- From: Pascal.Cuoq at cea.fr (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Collisions using //@ or /*@
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Collisions using //@ or /*@
- From: jean-baptiste.jeannin at hispano-suiza-sa.com (jean-baptiste.jeannin@hispano-suiza-sa.com)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Collisions using //@ or /*@
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] unbound identifier \result
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Collisions using //@ or /*@
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Collisions using //@ or /*@
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Collisions using //@ or /*@
- Index(es):