Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Verification of axiomatization

Thank you very much to all.
An assert 0<>0 can't be automatically proved currently (With a timeout=400). 
Then I will probably try the second method : a coq model.

Best regards,
Nicolas.

Claude March? a ?crit :
> 
> Claude March? wrote:
>> I don't understand why you are so pessimistic, Pascal.
>> The answer is simple: just realize your axiomatization in Cuoq. Sorry: I 
>> meant in Coq.
> 
> Another, probably quicker, possibility is first to try to prove
> 
> //@ lemma l : 0=0;
> 
> from your axiomatization. If it is proven, then yes surely you have to 
> investigate you axiomatization. A way to do it then is to remove parts 
> of it until you discovered the eaxt subset of axioms that can derive false.
> 
> And if the lemme is not proven, then you might also try to prove
> 
> //@ assert 0=0;
> 
> just before return statement of the function that should not be proved 
> so quickly. And then proceed the same to remove some part of axiomatization.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> - Claude
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Frama-c-discuss mailing list
> Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pi?ce jointe non texte a ?t? nettoy?e...
Nom: nicolas_stouls.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Taille: 445 octets
Desc: non disponible
Url: http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20090407/a15d22f9/attachment.vcf