Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- From: dmentre at linux-france.org (David MENTRE)
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 16:00:28 +0100
- In-reply-to: <4B1E5AA7.8020307@inria.fr>
- References: <40C72502-3C98-4574-9DC6-52FC4F981F26@first.fraunhofer.de> <4B1E5AA7.8020307@inria.fr>
Hello, 2009/12/8 Claude Marche <Claude.Marche at inria.fr>: > In a nearer future, there could a new pragma to control the generation > of such VCs. > > Anyway: any suggestion welcome ! Would it be useful to add automatically a clause "variant N-i;" for loops having the simple syntactic structure "for (i = ... ; i < N ; i++)"? This way proof obligations for such loops (which are quite common) would be automatically discharged. Regards, david
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- From: Boris.Hollas at de.bosch.com (Hollas Boris (CR/AEY1))
- [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- From: jens.gerlach at first.fraunhofer.de (Jens Gerlach)
- [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- Index(es):