Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- From: dak at adelard.com (Damien Karkinsky)
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:25:36 +0000
- In-reply-to: <4B25F5A1.3040303@cea.fr>
- References: <4B2276E4.2090702@adelard.com> <4B25F5A1.3040303@cea.fr>
Hi Patrick Thank you for the reply but I am not sure what you meant.p and *p are different types and \separated takes only memory locations. Is there a way to cast between them? Damien Damien BAUDIN Patrick wrote: > Hello, > Just from an ACSL point of view, the proof of the "assigns" > and "ensures" clauses of your spec requires locations "p" > and "*p" to be \separated. > Patrick Baudin. >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- From: Patrick.Baudin at cea.fr (BAUDIN Patrick)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- From: dak at adelard.com (Damien Karkinsky)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- From: Patrick.Baudin at cea.fr (BAUDIN Patrick)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Proof conditions with simple pointer assignment
- Index(es):