Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- From: kerstin.hartig at first.fraunhofer.de (Kerstin Hartig)
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:09:17 +0100
- References: <40C72502-3C98-4574-9DC6-52FC4F981F26@first.fraunhofer.de> <4B1E5AA7.8020307@inria.fr>
Hello, so is it correct, that at the moment there is no way to specify and prove a non-terminating function, that I want to be non-terminating ? As terminates \false; is ignored by Jessie one VC (variant decreases) remains unproven. Can I conclude it just means that I have a function that doesnt terminate (which I know about and is not problematic) but the rest is ok or does it affect maybe other VC's, that maybe are proven unwanted then. Regards, Kerstin -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: frama-c-discuss-bounces at lists.gforge.inria.fr im Auftrag von Claude Marche Gesendet: Di 08.12.2009 14:54 An: Frama-C public discussion Betreff: Re: [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version Jens Gerlach wrote: > We were able to deductively verify the following implementation of > linear search successfully with Jessie on top of why version 2.19. > > However, with why 2.23 there is one safety related VC that remains > unproven. > In the jessie gui, the unproven VC reads "variant decreases". > > Do we have to improve the specification to get rid of that issue? > If so, how? add "loop variant n-i;" and you should be done ! Since Why 2.22, the policy for generating termination VCS is as strict as possible, to guarantee soundness (see BTS #0000103) In the future, Jessie should support ACSL "terminates" clauses, to manually annotate function for which you don;t care about termination. In a nearer future, there could a new pragma to control the generation of such VCs. Anyway: any suggestion welcome ! - Claude > > Regards Jens > > /*@ > requires n >= 0; > requires \valid_range(a, 0, n-1); > > assigns \nothing; > > behavior some: > assumes \exists int i; (0 <= i < n) && a[i] == v; > ensures 0 <= \result < n; > ensures a[\result] == v; > ensures \forall int i; (0 <= i < \result) ==> a[i] != v; > > behavior none: > assumes \forall int i; (0 <= i < n) ==> a[i] != v; > ensures \result == n; > */ > int find(const int* a, int n, int v) > { > /*@ > loop invariant 0 <= i <= n; > loop invariant \forall int k; 0 <= k < i ==> a[k] != v; > */ > for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) > if (a[i] == v) > return i; > > return n; > } > > > -- > > Dr.-Ing. Jens Gerlach > Eingebettete Systeme - EST > Tel.: +49 (0)30 6392 1841 > Fax.: +49 (0)30 6392 1805 > E-Mail: jens.gerlach at first.fraunhofer.de > <mailto:jens.gerlach at first.fraunhofer.de> > > Fraunhofer-Institut f?r Rechnerarchitektur und Softwaretechnik, FIRST > Kekul?stra?e 7 > 12489 Berlin > Germany > http://www.first.fraunhofer.de > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Frama-c-discuss mailing list > Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss -- Claude March? | tel: +33 1 72 92 59 69 INRIA Saclay - ?le-de-France | mobile: +33 6 33 14 57 93 Parc Orsay Universit? | fax: +33 1 74 85 42 29 4, rue Jacques Monod - B?timent N | http://www.lri.fr/~marche/ F-91893 ORSAY Cedex | _______________________________________________ Frama-c-discuss mailing list Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 4605 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20091217/68650837/attachment.bin
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- From: jens.gerlach at first.fraunhofer.de (Jens Gerlach)
- [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] problem with verify a list
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Debugging huge theories
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] unproven VC with newer why version
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C doesn't warn me about the illegal assignment of a variable
- Index(es):