Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Loop invariants
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Loop invariants
- From: Boris.Hollas at de.bosch.com (Hollas Boris (CR/AEY1))
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 15:36:24 +0200
- In-reply-to: <4A082559.2080606@inria.fr>
- References: <FC0686BB6178BC43B9DC035287A11A720816A16419@SI-MBX12.de.bosch.com> <4A082559.2080606@inria.fr>
>Sure if condition is (i < n) or anything that implies (i < n), but >otherwise no. But if you are able to prove that the invariant holds, Ok, this answers my question. >then certainly you should be able to prove //@ assert i<n; either before Yes, this should be possible. I wondered whether Jessie is able to deduce this on its own. - Boris
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Loop invariants
- From: Boris.Hollas at de.bosch.com (Hollas Boris (CR/AEY1))
- [Frama-c-discuss] Loop invariants
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marché)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Loop invariants
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Loop invariants
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie plug-in
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Loop invariants
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] usage of why-dp
- Index(es):