Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] do we need another mailing list?
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] do we need another mailing list?
- From: Pascal.CUOQ at cea.fr (CUOQ Pascal)
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:37:50 +0200
- References: <534120fd0905201232h4b8407a9r3767a4760c8f2af6@mail.gmail.com><87eiujeax6.fsf@pat35-1-82-229-60-210.fbx.proxad.net><5EFD4D7AC6265F4D9D3A849CEA9219191AB1C0@LAXA.intra.cea.fr> <534120fd0905210140n2407997dv241b5d37373a2549@mail.gmail.com>
Dragan wrote: > It is a good idea. During weekend I will create something like this. Sorry ^^ I was only making a silly joke with reference to previous messages on this list. The best place for contributing is the wiki. There is a lot of useful information that it would be nice to have available and organized there. For instance I copied your Z3 on Ubuntu instructions there: http://bts.frama-c.com/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=mantis:frama-c:start#faq_tips_and_tricks Thank you for these detailed instructions. I edited a few things here and there, I may be worth checking it again. If a section becomes too long (such as "how to install theorem provers") it should be moved to its own page. As has been pointed out before, you need to create a BTS account to edit the wiki, but if you are going to use Frama-C you will need a BTS account anyway. It is very quick to obtain an account, we do not ask any questions, just choose a login and a password. It is true that one disadvantage is that the wiki contents are currently not indexed by google, but I will personnaly make sure that this situation is solved before there are 5000 words of user-contributed documentation in the wiki. For now, making it publicly accessible would only be additional work for us and we don't know if the wiki thing will catch on. You asked about the different "why" versions. The answer is technical. Frama-C and Why are both currently in development. Because of incompatible changes, a particular version of Frama-C only works with a particular version of Why. Thanks to the dynamic plug-in technology that is being put in place in Frama-C, this problem will soon disappear. Thanks again for your contribution Pascal
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] RE : Loop invariants with imbricated loops.
- From: dragan.stosic at gmail.com (Dragan)
- [Frama-c-discuss] RE : Loop invariants with imbricated loops.
- From: dmentre at linux-france.org (David MENTRE)
- [Frama-c-discuss] do we need another mailing list?
- From: Pascal.CUOQ at cea.fr (CUOQ Pascal)
- [Frama-c-discuss] do we need another mailing list?
- From: dragan.stosic at gmail.com (Dragan)
- [Frama-c-discuss] RE : Loop invariants with imbricated loops.
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] do we need another mailing list?
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] RE : Loop invariants with imbricated loops.
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] do we need another mailing list?
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] RE : Loop invariants with imbricated loops.
- Index(es):