Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C vs Ada/SPARK
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C vs Ada/SPARK
- From: Boris.Hollas at de.bosch.com (Hollas Boris (CR/AEY1))
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:54:35 +0100
- In-reply-to: <416260.32304.qm@web110610.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
- References: <416260.32304.qm@web110610.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
There's a Wikipedia article on ADA/SPARK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARK_(programming_language) Unfortunately, the webistes for SPARK don't give any useful details. E.g., does it support first-order logic? Apart from that, why do some many companies use C instead of Ada for embedded programming? I've read that even the aviation and military industry moved back to C.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C vs Ada/SPARK
- From: Pascal.CUOQ at cea.fr (CUOQ Pascal)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C vs Ada/SPARK
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C vs Ada/SPARK
- From: hxdg21 at yahoo.com (Aaron Rocha)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C vs Ada/SPARK
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Newbie question
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C vs Ada/SPARK
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C vs Ada/SPARK
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C vs Ada/SPARK
- Index(es):