Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Problem with new gWhy
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Problem with new gWhy
- From: mehdi at dogguy.org (Mehdi Dogguy)
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:27:55 +0200
- In-reply-to: <FC0686BB6178BC43B9DC035287A11A720DBBFE6996@SI-MBX12.de.bosch.com>
- References: <FC0686BB6178BC43B9DC035287A11A720DBBFE6996@SI-MBX12.de.bosch.com>
On 0, "Hollas Boris (CR/AEY1)" <Boris.Hollas at de.bosch.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I've just run gWhy from the Beryllium release on Windows. Now, I see a column "Statistics" that shows number of proved VC/all VC. However, I don't see which VC have been proved and which ones have not. Is this a bug? How do I get the nice red/green icons back? > As far as I know, this is normal in the newer version of gWhy (2.19). I think that the point is (in general) you want to know whether a given proof obligation has been proved. Which prover has done the job is a secondary information which might be not very interesting. But I agree that this can be interesting is some other situations and it would be nice to have a checkbox to active/desactivate it. Best regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Problem with new gWhy
- From: Boris.Hollas at de.bosch.com (Hollas Boris (CR/AEY1))
- [Frama-c-discuss] Problem with new gWhy
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Problem with new gWhy
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Compilation of Beryllium 20090901 without dynlink
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Problem with new gWhy
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Compilation of Beryllium 20090901 without dynlink
- Index(es):