Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- From: virgile.prevosto at cea.fr (Virgile Prevosto)
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:17:05 +0100
- In-reply-to: <E1NRpOA-0001r7-Sy@garm.runbox.com>
- References: <E1NRHCE-0007aW-Gi@fenris.runbox.com> <20100104111750.1b613521@is010235> <E1NRpOA-0001r7-Sy@garm.runbox.com>
Le lun. 04 janv. 2010 11:02:38 CET, "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler at dwheeler.com> a ?crit : > But two adjacent "//@" lines do NOT work. What's more, > this gave an incredibly misleading error message in a far later > line, and that's why I thought loop variants were unsupported. You're right, the location of the error is completely wrong and we have to investigate a bit further. The error message is correct, though: you can only have one loop annotation per loop, and the two one-line comments are seen as two distinct annotations. The only way to have multi-line annotations is to use the /*@ ... */ syntax. -- Virgile Prevosto Ing?nieur-Chercheur, CEA, LIST Laboratoire de S?ret? des Logiciels +33/0 1 69 08 82 98
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- From: dwheeler at dwheeler.com (David A. Wheeler)
- [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- From: dwheeler at dwheeler.com (David A. Wheeler)
- [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- From: virgile.prevosto at cea.fr (Virgile Prevosto)
- [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- From: dwheeler at dwheeler.com (David A. Wheeler)
- [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] With Why version 2.23, Jessie binary_search example fails. Why?
- Index(es):