Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Combining Simplify and Coq
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Combining Simplify and Coq
- From: michaelschausten at googlemail.com (Michael Schausten)
- Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 12:45:22 +0200
Hello, I'm trying to prove some C functions with frama-c. Some of the VCs could be automatically proved by some ATP (e.g. Simplify), but some can't. For the remaining VCs, I'd like to use Coq. I proved the first VCs with Simplify: frama-c -jessie-analysis -jessie-atp simplify file.c This gives me an output such as "total: 4, valid: 2, unknown: 2" Now for the remaining VCs I planned to prove with Coq, I know I can use: frama-c -jessie-analysis -jessie-atp coq file.c This creates a file file.jessie/coq/file_why.v, which I can open with the coqide, and start filling in the proves. My question now is: Is there a way to combine simplify and coq, to get a file_why.v where some of the proofs are already filled in (those that can be proved by simplify)? Regards Michael
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Combining Simplify and Coq
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Combining Simplify and Coq
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] bug in value analysis of programs with floating-point computations
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Combining Simplify and Coq
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] bug in value analysis of programs with floating-point computations
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Combining Simplify and Coq
- Index(es):