Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Proving the correctness of shifting operations
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Proving the correctness of shifting operations
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:25:11 +0200
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTiny9nSmoaKGNcoTT1ktQmsUCdWBzqW0rZLHXLlB@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <4C1A5DE2.40101@googlemail.com> <AANLkTiny9nSmoaKGNcoTT1ktQmsUCdWBzqW0rZLHXLlB@mail.gmail.com>
> - if x >= 2, then (asr x 1) >= 1 No, this axiom is too weak, but expressing that shifting by one is the same as dividing by two would work. Pascal
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Proving the correctness of shifting operations
- From: michaelschausten at googlemail.com (Michael Schausten)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Proving the correctness of shifting operations
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Proving the correctness of shifting operations
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Proving the correctness of shifting operations
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Problem with loop invariant
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Proving the correctness of shifting operations
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Type invariants
- Index(es):