Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Small function on buffer doesn't verify

  • Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Small function on buffer doesn't verify
  • From: Julien.Signoles at (Julien Signoles)
  • Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:59:58 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <1274100093.2155.8.camel@iti27>
  • References: <1273591300.4338.8.camel@iti27> <> <1274100093.2155.8.camel@iti27>


Boris Hollas a ?crit :
> On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 08:51 +0200, Claude Marche wrote:
>> See the FAQ or the manual about the --pp-annot option
> Only -pp-annot is recognized as an option, not --pp-annot. pp-annot is
> not mentioned in the ACSL reference.

-pp-annot is an option of Frama-C. Thus it is described in the Frama-C 
manual (, not 
in the ACSL reference.

> However, this code still doesn't verify:
> #define BUFF_SIZE  4
> /*@ requires \valid(msg+(0..BUFF_SIZE));
>     ensures msg[BUFF_SIZE] == '\0';
> */
> int setFoo(char* msg) {
>   msg[BUFF_SIZE] = '\0';
>   msg[BUFF_SIZE-1] = '\0';
>   return 0;
> }
> ~/progs/C/frama-c/test$ frama-c -jessie -pp-annot t.c
> [kernel] preprocessing with "gcc -C -E -I.  -dD t.c"
> t.c:3:[kernel] user error: Error during annotations analysis: unbound
> logic variable BUFF_SIZE
> [kernel] user error: skipping file "t.c" that has errors.
> [kernel] Plugin kernel aborted because of invalid user input(s).

It works if you insert a space between .. and BUFF_SIZE like this:

	/*@ requires \valid(msg+(0.. BUFF_SIZE));

Please feel free to add a feature wish on the BTS in order to support 
the form without extra space.