Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] \at in ACSL assertions
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] \at in ACSL assertions
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:33:33 +0100
- In-reply-to: <4CE13E87.5030807@adacore.com>
- References: <AANLkTimyk_961c8Xk6_U33TAxabBGSeoaRB+EtM-OiBR@mail.gmail.com> <20101115145125.5bad24be@is010235> <4CE13E87.5030807@adacore.com>
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Yannick Moy <yannick.moy at adacore.com> wrote: > Interesting possibility, to designate the last value at some label I initially thought this would allow to talk imprecisely about execution paths in ACSL, but now that I think about it, I am not sure it is limited to imprecise characterizations of execution paths. Viz: for (i=0; i<=5; i++) { a: j=i; b: j=i; } /*@ assert \at( \at( \at( \at( \at( \at(i, b), a), b), a), b), a) == 2; */ Pascal
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] \at in ACSL assertions
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] \at in ACSL assertions
- From: virgile.prevosto at cea.fr (Virgile Prevosto)
- [Frama-c-discuss] \at in ACSL assertions
- From: yannick.moy at adacore.com (Yannick Moy)
- [Frama-c-discuss] \at in ACSL assertions
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] \at in ACSL assertions
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] \at in ACSL assertions
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] \at in ACSL assertions
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] \at in ACSL assertions
- Index(es):