Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Local variables leading to
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Local variables leading to
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:53:54 +0200
- In-reply-to: <4CBBF4B8.8030908@inria.fr>
- References: <201010171700.49736.mueller@uni-trier.de> <AANLkTimedC0EbbRomeYC9e3qPyF4WX3qckFRCEtKEXec@mail.gmail.com> <2098318039.131518.1287333300127.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr> <4CBBF4B8.8030908@inria.fr>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Claude Marche <Claude.Marche at inria.fr> wrote: > > Hi, > > Changing the contract of my_changes into > > /*@ > ?requires \valid(s); > ?assigns s->i; > ?ensures s->i == s->j; > */ > > would probably be better. And Simplify proves all the generated obligations, so there is not reason to think that the axiomatization is lacking. You should be able to prove the same obligations in Coq if you wish. Pascal
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Local variables leading to
- From: mueller at uni-trier.de (Norbert Müller)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Local variables leading to
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Local variables leading to
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Local variables leading to
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Local variables leading to
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] a value analysis case studie
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Local variables leading to
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Local variables leading to
- Index(es):