Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Binary search now works with Alt-Ergo 0.92
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Binary search now works with Alt-Ergo 0.92
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:46:34 +0200
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTinQpoR2tTrzEL=18tGThrKE+MfRLE6KB60XfSjL@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <1285673055.1497.159.camel@iti27> <AANLkTinQpoR2tTrzEL=18tGThrKE+MfRLE6KB60XfSjL@mail.gmail.com>
> Could you give more context? Why is it good news that an example > doesn't pass verification anymore? I'm puzzled. :-) When the example has a definite bug, it is good news that it no longer passes verification. Alt-ergo 0.91 had a bug that was apparently linked to the presence of divisions in the target program. See bugs: http://bts.frama-c.com/view.php?id=539 as well as 533, 514, 571.
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Binary search now works with Alt-Ergo 0.92
- From: hollas at informatik.htw-dresden.de (Boris Hollas)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Binary search now works with Alt-Ergo 0.92
- From: dmentre at linux-france.org (David MENTRE)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Binary search now works with Alt-Ergo 0.92
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Binary search now works with Alt-Ergo 0.92
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Binary search now works with Alt-Ergo 0.92
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Binary search now works with Alt-Ergo 0.92
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] problem with VS project
- Index(es):