Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Problem of "\separated" with WP
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Problem of "\separated" with WP
- From: marsishandsome at gmail.com (mars Gu)
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 11:05:55 +0200
Hello, Thank you for your answer of my question about "separated memory model". But I still have some problems about how to use it. I write a program "copy2.c" to test "separated memory model". The function "void copy(const value_type* a, size_type n, value_type* b)" could be proved, only if "separated memory model" is used. I start the program "copy2.c" with the following command: "frama-c-gui -wp -wp-proof alt-ergo copy2.c". The version of Frama-c is "Frama-C Carbon-20110201+dev". The following commands: "#pragma SeparationPolicy(regions)" and "requires \separated(a+(0..n-1), b+(0..n-1));" are used to ensure, that array a and array b are separated. The result is, that Line 39, "//@ assert i==0 ==> b[0] == a[0];" can be proved, while Line 40, "//@ assert i==1 ==> b[0] == a[0];" cannot be proved. The most likely problem of this result is, that array a and array b are not separated. I want to know, whether my usage of "separated memory model" is right or not? If not, could you give me an example, to illustrate, how to use it? Thank you Liangliang Gu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20110804/77301fac/attachment.htm> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: copy2.c Type: text/x-csrc Size: 869 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20110804/77301fac/attachment.c>
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Problem of "\separated" with WP
- From: loic.correnson at cea.fr (Loïc Correnson)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Problem of "\separated" with WP
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Problem with using "predicate" in "loop invariant"
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Problem of "\separated" with WP
- Index(es):