Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Question about (the absence of) "/*undefined sequence*/"
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Question about (the absence of) "/*undefined sequence*/"
- From: bagnara at cs.unipr.it (Roberto Bagnara)
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:59:51 +0200
Hi there. In the absence of any "/*undefined sequence*/" comment resulting from a successful execution of frama-c -val -print file.c can one assume one or both the following? 1) In `file.c', the order in which side effects take place is fully defined by the standard. 2) That order is faithfully reflected in the transformed program shown as output. Thanks, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:bagnara at cs.unipr.it
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Question about (the absence of) "/*undefined sequence*/"
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Question about (the absence of) "/*undefined sequence*/"
- Prev by Date: No subject
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Question about (the absence of) "/*undefined sequence*/"
- Previous by thread: No subject
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Question about (the absence of) "/*undefined sequence*/"
- Index(es):