Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Change makefile for typerex
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Change makefile for typerex
- From: virgile.prevosto at m4x.org (Virgile Prevosto)
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:43:42 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1334647142.2185.7.camel@iti27.informatik.htw-dresden.de>
- References: <1334647142.2185.7.camel@iti27.informatik.htw-dresden.de>
Hello, 2012/4/17 Boris Hollas <hollas at informatik.htw-dresden.de>: > Hello, > > has anybody sucessfully used ocamlpro's typerex-mode to navigate the > Frama-C source tree? I tried it with the first version. It worked fine, but I was unable to use the grep commands or jump to a definition in an external file: the typerex server was eating all the available memory. I didn't check if the situation was better with the second release, though. > > Also, which changes are needed for my plugin-makefile or the master > makefile to use ocp-ocamlc -m instead of ocamlc? In principle, you don't have to change anything: just compile with OCAMLC="ocp-ocamlc -m" make The OCAMLC variable in $FRAMAC_SHARE/Makefile.config will then be overriden. Note that you have to do a make clean before, in order to force a complete recompilation, so that typerex will generate its annotation files. Best regards, -- E tutto per oggi, a la prossima volta Virgile
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Change makefile for typerex
- From: hollas at informatik.htw-dresden.de (Boris Hollas)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Change makefile for typerex
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] similar assertions not all validated
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] similar assertions not all validated
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Change makefile for typerex
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] similar assertions not all validated
- Index(es):