Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] How to make wp to prove the invariant successfully?

  • Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] How to make wp to prove the invariant successfully?
  • From: njucslzh0714 at gmail.com (Henry)
  • Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:26:04 +0800
  • In-reply-to: <CALiiei7XaT4q6C5-ij8=2wndqKE-NjShjw8DD0wJ=2OgF2uYKQ@mail.gmail.com>
  • References: <CALiiei7XaT4q6C5-ij8=2wndqKE-NjShjw8DD0wJ=2OgF2uYKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, I don't understand the \forall quantifier properly. But if the
invariant is changed to be 0 <= x <= (z+1.0), then the status is unknown.
Is the type of the constant very important? Which type it should be if the
type of x and z is different?

Henry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20120207/f65b6fe2/attachment.htm>