Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

---

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Valid physical address

---

• Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Valid physical address
• From: anne.pacalet at free.fr (Anne Pacalet)
• Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 10:03:12 +0200
• In-reply-to: <4FA38B99.4070207@c-s.fr>
• References: <4FA38A43.5080809@free.fr> <4FA38B99.4070207@c-s.fr>

---

Le 04/05/2012 09:56, Jean-Marc Harang a ?crit :
> Perhaps try to use this option :
> -absolute-valid-range 0xABCD-0xB000
> with the correct range ;)

Yes !!!
I looked at the value analysis options
but I haven't looked into the kernel options. Sorry !
This one seems to be exactly what I need.
Thank you very much.
-- 
Anne.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [Frama-c-discuss] Valid physical address
    • From: jean-marc.harang at c-s.fr (Jean-Marc Harang)

• References:
  • [Frama-c-discuss] Valid physical address
    • From: anne.pacalet at free.fr (Anne Pacalet)
  • [Frama-c-discuss] Valid physical address
    • From: jean-marc.harang at c-s.fr (Jean-Marc Harang)

• Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Valid physical address
• Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Valid physical address
• Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Valid physical address
• Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Valid physical address
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread