Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Semantic unrolling and trace partitioning
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Semantic unrolling and trace partitioning
- From: dhekir at gmail.com (Daniel Garcia)
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 09:55:44 +0200
Hi, I'd like to know if Frama-C's semantic unrolling (-slevel) is equivalent to trace partitioning. It seems somewhat similar to me, but I didn't see it mentioned anywhere, so maybe there are important differences between them? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20130704/a1f427ae/attachment.html>
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Semantic unrolling and trace partitioning
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Semantic unrolling and trace partitioning
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Using frama-c to verify coding patterns of concurrent sw
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Semantic unrolling and trace partitioning
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Using frama-c to verify coding patterns of concurrent sw
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Semantic unrolling and trace partitioning
- Index(es):