Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Introductory slides on Frama-C

Great !
	L.

Le 3 sept. 2013 ? 23:45, Yannick Moy <moy at adacore.com> a ?crit :

> -- David MENTRE (2013-09-03)
>> 
>> I tried to present an up-to-date view of Frama-C and its ecosystem.
>> 
>> I would be glad to get any feedback about them: error, things to improve, etc.
> 
> Nice tour!
> 
>> In slide 47, behaviours found and not_found have opposite logical condition for assumes clauses. However I find difficult to explain it without going back to first order logic (!(a ==> b) eq. !(!a || b) eq. ...) which I would like to avoid. Any idea on a way to explain that simply?
> 
> I would explain it starting with the simpler assumes:
> 
>  \exists index i; a[i] == v
>  \forall index i; a[i] != v
> 
> which clearly are complementary propositions. Then you can explain that they are equivalent to the propositions you wrote on your slide.
> --
> Yannick Moy, Senior Software Engineer, AdaCore
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Frama-c-discuss mailing list
> Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss