Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] WP: assigns needed to prove function contract?
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] WP: assigns needed to prove function contract?
- From: dmentre at linux-france.org (David MENTRE)
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 09:42:59 +0200
Hello, In the attached find.c example, everything is proved with WP (loop invariant, function contract). However, if I remove the "loop assigns i;" in the for loop, the ensures clauses of the function contract are not proved any more. Can somebody explain to me why, as I think my loop invariant is building all the information needed to prove the ensures clauses. As far as I remember, this was not the case with previous version of Frama-C (or with Jessie?). Best regards, david -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: find.c Type: text/x-csrc Size: 540 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20130909/6d13e707/attachment.c>
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP: assigns needed to prove function contract?
- From: loic.correnson at cea.fr (Loïc Correnson)
- [Frama-c-discuss] WP: assigns needed to prove function contract?
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Could I disable acsl/rte/wp annotation in value analysis? or treat all property to be valid in value analysis?
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] WP: assigns needed to prove function contract?
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Could I disable acsl/rte/wp annotation in value analysis? or treat all property to be valid in value analysis?
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] WP: assigns needed to prove function contract?
- Index(es):