Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Code proved with Fluorine is more proved with Neon
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Code proved with Fluorine is more proved with Neon
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marché)
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 12:13:09 +0200
- In-reply-to: <87mwe3sjnb.fsf@suntof.isae.fr>
- References: <87mwe3sjnb.fsf@suntof.isae.fr>
Hello, Le 27/05/2014 10:36, Christophe Garion a ?crit : > z3 4.3.1 via why3 seems to prove all the assertions under Neon, so it > may be an Alt-Ergo problem. External provers are not supposed to be equivalent, so this is non-sense to say that there is a problem with a prover X if it does not prove something that is proved by a prover Y. This is the reason why using several external provers is recommended, - Claude -- Claude March? | tel: +33 1 72 92 59 69 INRIA Saclay - ?le-de-France | Universit? Paris-sud, Bat. 650 | http://www.lri.fr/~marche/ F-91405 ORSAY Cedex |
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Code proved with Fluorine is more proved with Neon
- From: christophe.garion at isae.fr (Christophe Garion)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Code proved with Fluorine is more proved with Neon
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Code proved with Fluorine is more proved with Neon
- From: christophe.garion at isae.fr (Christophe Garion)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Code proved with Fluorine is more proved with Neon
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Not proving when predicate
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Code proved with Fluorine is more proved with Neon
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Code proved with Fluorine is more proved with Neon
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Code proved with Fluorine is more proved with Neon
- Index(es):