Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] (no subject)
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] (no subject)
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 08:50:48 +0100
- In-reply-to: <b4be16c9a39d29011f042916f6bbc348.squirrel@mail.mpi-sws.org>
- References: <ddc718fd7d0e66a4f3e5121676cf59e2.squirrel@mail.mpi-sws.org> <5453DE5E.4070401@inria.fr> <b4be16c9a39d29011f042916f6bbc348.squirrel@mail.mpi-sws.org>
On 11/01/2014 07:10 PM, gavran at mpi-sws.org wrote: > Thank you for the answer, Clauude. Yes, "new_value" is my attempt to mimic > malloc (I abstracted the details out). Reason why I started doing it in > the first place was that WP displayed the warning: "warning: Allocable, > Freeable, Valid_read, Fresh and Initialized not yet implemented". > As it is under "experimental" section in ACSL documentation, I concluded > it is just not yet implemented. More precisely: these "experimental" ACSL clauses *are implemented in Frama-C kernel*. But they may not be supported by plug-ins. If the warning above is issued with the last version of WP, then yes it means these are not supported by WP. > (I have problems with Jessie, it crashes and I still don't get why, so I > couldn't try with it.). We can't help if you do not provide more details... > Which prover do you use? (that supports those "experimental" features) This support is not dependent on which prover you use. This is supported by Jessie "experimentally", meaning that problems may show up, such as when you do not provide the pragma SeparationPolicy(none) With this pragma, the file as I gave it in my previous mail is fully proved by Frama-C/Jessie/Why3 + any prover like Alt-Ergo, CVC4, Z3. - Claude
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] (no subject)
- From: gavran at mpi-sws.org (gavran at mpi-sws.org)
- [Frama-c-discuss] (no subject)
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] (no subject)
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] WP failing to prove a simple absence of RTE unsigned overflow
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] (no subject)
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] (no subject)
- Index(es):