Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] New version of ACSL by Example
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] New version of ACSL by Example
- From: jens.gerlach at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Gerlach, Jens)
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:53:41 +0000
Dear Frama-C users, the verification group at Fraunhofer FOKUS has provided a new version of ?ACSL by Example?. You can download it from http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/download/acsl_by_example The examples have been verified with the Neon release of Frama-C/WP. - We have added more predicates in order to make our specifications more expressive (and concise). - In the previous version some proof obligations of three algorithms (equal_range and the two version of remove_copy) had to be verified with Coq. Now we have to resort to Coq only for some proof obligations of the second version of remove_copy. The changes are described in more detail in Section 1.1. Regards Jens Gerlach
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Dynamically allocated lists
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Dynamically allocated lists
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
- Index(es):