Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified

  • Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Preservation of base loop invariant not verified
  • From: loic.correnson at cea.fr (Loïc Correnson)
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:05:57 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <CA+Tazt76hoLNNnyXHo2TpXc7x41c8vT5+=0k4ughbbvoVpsCFQ@mail.gmail.com>
  • References: <CA+Tazt7sOtQxyvgLwbFvWDQ=pniO2AQFh-xC216vEXd9aOprqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+Tazt76hoLNNnyXHo2TpXc7x41c8vT5+=0k4ughbbvoVpsCFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Your property P is not provable *by induction* ; it means that P(j+1) is not a logic consequence of P(j).
(read in the WP manual about the proof obligations generated for loop invariants).
Actually, there is nothing in your loop invariants about the value of (i) at any loop turn?
L.