Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] WP plugin report incorrect

Hello,

The option -wp-invariants is an experimental feature of WP trying to 
prove ACSL "invariant" clause holding inside a loop body as "loop 
invariant" clause.
It seems that there is something wrong with that option.
Since you have no such "invariant" clause, don't use it.

Patrick.

Le 05/10/2015 18:31, Christoph Rauch a écrit :
> Hi David,
>
>> On 05 Oct 2015, at 18:02, David MENTRE <dmentre at linux-france.org> wrote:
>>
>> Le 05/10/2015 17:56, Christoph Rauch a écrit :
>>> If I completely remove the loop and thus the invariant, it doesn’t verify. How can it possibly prove the loop invariant?
>> Which prover are you using? I tried with Alt-Ergo and CVC3 and the loop invariant in not proved, for both your first code and the code not calling swap().
> Using `-wp-invariants’, which seems to be the cause for the troubles, every prover I tried yields positive (i.e. wrong) results: Alt-Ergo, CVC4, and Z3.
>
> Best,
> Christoph
> _______________________________________________
> Frama-c-discuss mailing list
> Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss


-- 
Patrick Baudin, DILS/LSL, Bât. 862,
Point Courrier n° 174
Institut CARNOT CEA LIST,
CEA Saclay Nano-INNOV,
91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France.
tel: +33 (0)1 6908 2072