Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Control flow graphs and code coverage
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Control flow graphs and code coverage
- From: elfring at users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 20:22:49 +0100
Hello, I have read the user manual for your evolving software. Now I would like to find a bit more out from technology areas which are involved here. * Would you like to share any more information about the use of advanced control flow graphs? * Do extended versions get any special names? * How can the amount of source code which is used between statements like "goto" (in the C programming language) be modelled by such a software design approach? Use case: Do you try to improve capabilities for static source analysis in the way that issues which are similar to the description of consequences from a special "goto fail;" in the article "An interesting SSL implementation bug" can be better detected? http://blog.frama-c.com/index.php?post/2014/02/23/CVE-2013-5914 * Do you know any plug-ins (or add-ons) which collaborate with related software tools? Regards, Markus
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Control flow graphs and code coverage
- From: chan.ngo2203 at gmail.com (Chan Ngo)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Control flow graphs and code coverage
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Control flow graphs and code coverage
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] JFLA'16 : 2ème appel à participation
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Control flow graphs and code coverage
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] JFLA'16 : 2ème appel à participation
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Control flow graphs and code coverage
- Index(es):