Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] WP 0.9 (for Magnesium) Compatible with Coq 8.5?

Just to say that the compatibility between WP 0.9 and Coq 8.5 is not 
urgent for me anymore: I created a fresh opam environment with Coq 
8.4pl6 + Why3 + Frama-C. (I still cannot verify the lemma, though.)

---
Pablo
http://lia.ufc.br/~pmsf/

Em 2016-03-08 13:22, Pablo M. S. Farias escreveu:
> Hello, all!
> 
> As reported in the previous e-mail, I'm having trouble verifying this
> in WP (also attached):
> 
>   /*@ lemma ptr_inc:  \forall int n, *v, *p;
>         n >= 0 ==> \valid_read(v + (0..n-1)) ==> v <= p < v+n ==>
>         v <= p+1;
>    */
> 
> I would like to use Coq to try out a proof, but running
> 
>   frama-c-gui -wp -wp-prover coqide lemma_ptr_inc.c
> 
> gives this output:
> 
>   [kernel] Parsing FRAMAC_SHARE/libc/__fc_builtin_for_normalization.i
> (no preprocessing)
>   [kernel] Parsing lemma_ptr_inc.c (with preprocessing)
>   [wp] Running WP plugin...
>   [wp] Collecting axiomatic usage
>   [wp] 1 goal scheduled
>   [wp] [Coq] Compiling 'BuiltIn.v'.
>   [wp] [Coq] 'BuiltIn.v' compilation failed.
>   Don't know what to do with -as bool -as int -as real -as map
>   See -help for the list of supported options
>   [wp] [Coq] Goal typed_lemma_ptr_inc : Failed
>        Error: Compilation of 'BuiltIn.v' failed.
>   [wp] Proved goals:    0 / 1
>        Coq:             0  (failed: 1)
> 
> Is WP 0.9 (for Magnesium-20151002) compatible with Coq 8.5 (which I'm
> using)? Am I doing something wrong?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> --
> Pablo
> http://lia.ufc.br/~pmsf/