Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- From: jens.gerlach at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Gerlach, Jens)
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:53:46 +0000
- In-reply-to: <F9BCB46B-F7E3-4BF7-B1D1-EA35D4AFD667@adacore.com>
- References: <F3DA813E-423C-4D8C-997A-92FC1E00F0F1@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <F9BCB46B-F7E3-4BF7-B1D1-EA35D4AFD667@adacore.com>
Hello Yannick, I donât think we had a bias towards Alt-Ergo because for a long time we have used CVC4 and Z3 in our verification pipeline before Alt-Ergo. I suspect, however, that the Alt-Ergo development follows WP and Why3 more closely than the other provers. And I think, Alt-Ergo has really become better over the last years. Also, CVC4 hasnât had a new stable release for a long time (CVC4-1.5 is just a week out and we havenât checked it yet). > In our experience, the usefulness of a prover is that it proves something that other provers don't. > With that angle, most provers are very useful. I completely agree. Jens -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20170718/29f922bc/attachment.html>
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- From: Julien.Signoles at cea.fr (Julien Signoles)
- [Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- From: jens.gerlach at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Gerlach, Jens)
- [Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- From: moy at adacore.com (Yannick Moy)
- [Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] ACSL by Example and automatic provers
- Index(es):