Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

---

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C 16 (Sulfur) - beta

---

• Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C 16 (Sulfur) - beta
• From: loic.correnson at cea.fr (Loïc Correnson)
• Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 10:40:04 +0100
• In-reply-to: <0FE9F213-FF4C-47D7-8F25-CDB1091E0B60@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
• References: <0FE9F213-FF4C-47D7-8F25-CDB1091E0B60@fokus.fraunhofer.de>

---

The next WP release shall work on both Coq 8.5+ and 8.6+ ; the configure accepts both.
	L.

> Le 1 nov. 2017 à 11:07, Gerlach, Jens <jens.gerlach at fokus.fraunhofer.de> a écrit :
> 
> Hello,
> 
> With Frama-C 15 the recommended Coq version for WP is 8.5.3.
> Does this also hold for Frama-C 16?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jens
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Frama-c-discuss mailing list
> Frama-c-discuss at lists.gforge.inria.fr
> https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss

---

• References:
  • [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C 16 (Sulfur) - beta
    • From: jens.gerlach at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Gerlach, Jens)

• Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Does WP support declare ghost variables of logic types ?
• Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] looking for deductive verification success stories
• Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C 16 (Sulfur) - beta
• Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Backward Conditioning?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread