Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C native:coq

Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C native:coq
From: jens.gerlach at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Gerlach, Jens)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:32:12 +0000
In-reply-to: <FBBB3020-0C33-45BA-8E55-BC0CCEB61F1B@cea.fr>
References: <1655D892-AC49-4B19-8D69-2543C8557E50@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <FBBB3020-0C33-45BA-8E55-BC0CCEB61F1B@cea.fr>

Hello LoÃ¯c,

> Sorry, actually it is not completely clear. The point is that you may can use WP drivers to enrich your proof context with additional theories.
> In these additional theories, you may specify lemmas that can be proved interactively with Why3, or in Coq, or with any another prover.

Thank you for the explanation.

> 
> We are also working with ACSL and WP extensions for a better integration with Why3 and Coq proof support. But Iâ€™m afraid it will not be available for the very next release.

Does this mean that the native Coq interface remains in place until these newer development will have been released?
(I would humbly suggest so!-)

Jens

Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C native:coq
  - From: loic.correnson at cea.fr (Loïc Correnson)

References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C native:coq
  - From: jens.gerlach at fokus.fraunhofer.de (Gerlach, Jens)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C native:coq
  - From: loic.correnson at cea.fr (Loïc Correnson)

Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C native:coq
Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Fwd: Is it possible to define polymorphic axioms? memcpy etc
Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C native:coq
Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-C native:coq
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread