Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Another small item for next release

  • Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Another small item for next release
  • From: virgile.prevosto at (Virgile Prevosto)
  • Date: Thu Jun 19 09:54:12 2008
  • In-reply-to: <1213810767.16628.2.camel@vmx>
  • References: <> <20080618101847.1e05ec4f@is005115> <1213810767.16628.2.camel@vmx>


Le mer 18 jun 2008 13:39:27 CEST,
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <> a ?crit :

> Thank you. So do I understand correctly that simultaneous installation
> of frama-c-20080502 and why-2.13 should not lead to compatibility
> problems?

To the extent of the (lack of) warranty provided by the LGPL, yes,
this is correct. Note however that some small patches of Why
installation and Frama-C configuration must be applied by Godi.

> Wouldn't renaming the distribution of Why+Jessie in Frama-C make sense
> to avoid future issues

I can only speak for myself, but my guess is that the best option would
be to keep releases of Why and Frama-C in sync and let the default
Frama-C configuration use an already installed Why, keeping the local
Why sources only as a backup if Why couldn't be found.

E tutto per oggi, a la prossima volta.