# Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples

*Subject*: [Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples*From*: yannick.moy at gmail.com (Yannick Moy)*Date*: Tue Oct 14 13:02:50 2008*In-reply-to*: <0215081F-3BED-430D-9C3B-E5ABD4212D94@first.fraunhofer.de>*References*: <4FA912B7D4D8468FBACF5B5DDE198385@AHARDPLACE> <1B3FA18004D74D5787DB01AD1EB95900@AHARDPLACE> <14791e30810100413p41eb2e81i89e9f8da63b3040d@mail.gmail.com> <C5F22AF6BA75453CA2EDEADB270E33F3@AHARDPLACE> <14791e30810100505i22345288s5a519d7eab160828@mail.gmail.com> <8F56F47622DB4469B4EBD734D7C08712@AHARDPLACE> <48F33637.5080109@inria.fr> <756435F7D0F44C23B2C7F91E053F77B9@AHARDPLACE> <14791e30810140214r29c903b5w3287a3c33afde56f@mail.gmail.com> <0215081F-3BED-430D-9C3B-E5ABD4212D94@first.fraunhofer.de>

Hi, Sorry, I did only check on the current unreleased version. I'll check on a released version next time. This will be available in the next release so. Yannick On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Jens Gerlach < jens.gerlach@first.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Dear Yannik, > > >> But if I am using the Pre Label I don't meet the ensures requirements, or >> at least I don't get a green bullet. >> > > as I told you, the normal way of treating separation in Jessie is to divide > heap into regions automatically, which will become the default in the next > release. With only one region for memory, your example is proved with any of > Z3, Alt-Ergo and Simplify (not Yices though). > > To prove instead that the value of [a] after copying is the same as the > value of [b] before, you need to strengthen the loop invariant like follows, > to assess that all of [b] does not change during the loop. > > /*@ requires 0 < n; > @ requires \valid_range(a, 0, n-1) && \valid_range(b, 0, n-1); > @ requires disjoint_arrays(a, b, n); > @ ensures \forall int k; 0 <= k < n ==> a[k] == \at(b[k],Pre); > @*/ > void array_cpy(int* a, int n, int* b) > { > /*@ loop invariant 0 <= i <= n; > @ loop invariant \forall int m; 0 <= m < n ==> b[m] == \at(b[m],Pre); > @ loop invariant \forall int m; 0 <= m < i ==> a[m] == b[m]; > @*/ > for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) > a[i] = b[i]; > } > > > I just run this example under Helium (Mac OS X) (adding the disjoint_arrays > predicate) and received the following error message > > running gcc -C -E -I. array.c > File array.c, line 7, characters 50-63: > Error during analysis of annotation: logic label `Pre' not found > array.c:7: Warning: ignoring logic specification of function array_cpy > Parsing > > Best regards > > Jens Gerlach > > With these annotations, Z3, ALt-Ergo and Simplify still prove your function > (not Yices). > > >> >> Currently I'm stuck with an other Problem. Within some annotated string.h >> examples I found a dereferenced \result. >> >> Attempts to apply it to my example will result in the following error. >> >> Fatal error: exception Assert_failure("src/jessie/interp.ml", 336, 14) >> >> do I get it due to my Hydrogen version ? >> > > Most probably, yes. There was such a problem with derefencing \result and > it was solved. The best way to track this kind of problem is to fill in a > bug report on the Frama-C public BTS, so that you get a precise answer when > the bug gets fixed. > > HTH. > > -- > Yannick > _______________________________________________ > Frama-c-discuss mailing list > Frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > Frama-c-discuss mailing list > Frama-c-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frama-c-discuss > > -- Yannick -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/attachments/20081014/155292f7/attachment.html

**References**:**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples***From:*Christoph.Weber at first.fraunhofer.de (Christoph Weber)

**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples***From:*Christoph.Weber at first.fraunhofer.de (Christoph Weber)

**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples***From:*yannick.moy at gmail.com (Yannick Moy)

**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples***From:*Christoph.Weber at first.fraunhofer.de (Christoph Weber)

**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples***From:*yannick.moy at gmail.com (Yannick Moy)

**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples***From:*Christoph.Weber at first.fraunhofer.de (Christoph Weber)

**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples***From:*Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marché)

**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples***From:*Christoph.Weber at first.fraunhofer.de (Christoph Weber)

**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples***From:*yannick.moy at gmail.com (Yannick Moy)

**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples***From:*jens.gerlach at first.fraunhofer.de (Jens Gerlach)

- Prev by Date:
**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples** - Next by Date:
**[Frama-c-discuss] New Specification Examples** - Previous by thread:
**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples** - Next by thread:
**[Frama-c-discuss] Specification Examples** - Index(es):