Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] [Jessie] Issue with behavior in contracts



Hello,

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 17:30, David MENTRE <dmentre at linux-france.org> wrote:
> I would like to define the behaviour of read() syscall. I'm using the
> following contract:
> /*@ requires fd >= 0;
> ? ?requires count > 0;
> ? ?requires \valid((char*)buf+(0..count-1));
> ? ?behavior error:
> ? ? ?assigns global_error_number;
> ? ? ?ensures \result < 0;
> ? ?behavior end_of_file:
> ? ? ?assigns \nothing;
> ? ? ?ensures \result == 0;
> ? ?behavior normal:
> ? ? ?assigns ((char*)buf)[0..count-1];
> ? ? ?ensures ((char*)buf)[0] >= 0 && ((char*)buf)[0] < 256;
> ? ? ?ensures \result > 0;
> ?*/
> // ?complete behaviors error, end_of_file, normal;
> ssize_t read(int fd, void *buf, size_t count);
[...]
> However, when I run frama-c -jessie-analysis, I have the following
> error message:
> ?No code for function read, default assigns generated
>
> Is my contract for read() really taken into account? In that case, is
> it a spurious error message?