Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Verifying recursive functions
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Verifying recursive functions
- From: Boris.Hollas at de.bosch.com (Hollas Boris (CR/AEY1))
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:33:03 +0100
Hello Claude, >Your question is a bit imprecise: by "a way to verify recursive >functions", do you mean: verify there termination ? or verify some >functional behavior of them ? My ultimate goal is to prove total correctness, ie the complete specification and termination. But I'm also happy with either partial correctness or termination. I don't understand the assert clause in the code below: - "0 <= n" follows from the precondition - "n-1 < n" is a tautology So the assert clause should always evaluate to true, irrespective of what the program does? - Boris /*@ requires n >= 0; @ ensures is_prod(1,n,\result); @ decreases n; // not yet supported by Jessie plugin @*/ int fact(int n) { if (n == 0) return 1; // simulating the VC for the decreases clause //@ assert 0 <= n && n-1 < n; return n * fact(n-1);
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Verifying recursive functions
- From: Pascal.Cuoq at cea.fr (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Verifying recursive functions
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Getting a node from its id for a particular pdg
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Verifying recursive functions
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Verifying recursive functions
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Verifying recursive functions
- Index(es):