Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] How to deal with uint32
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] How to deal with uint32
- From: dak at adelard.com (Damien Karkinsky)
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:34:23 +0000
Hi all, I have a problem with a piece of code that contains uint32 type defined variables. When setting the variable, Frama-C attempts to prove that the value is within bounds and no overflow will occur. For example the code: uint32 Var1, Var2; ... Var1 |= ((Var1 ) & Var2); results in two proof obligations to show that; 0<= bw_and(integer_of_uint32(Var1), integer_of_uint32(Var2)) and bw_and(integer_of_uint32(Var1), integer_of_uint32(Var2)) <= 4294967295 It seems the function integer_of_uint32 is undefined and hence the conditions cannot be discharged. Do you have any suggestions how to go about this problem? Thank you Regards Damien
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] How to deal with uint32
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] How to deal with uint32
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] questions about value analysis
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] How to deal with uint32
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] questions about value analysis
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] How to deal with uint32
- Index(es):