Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Compilation of Beryllium 20090901 without dynlink

Julien Signoles a ?crit :
>> [?]
>> checking for /usr/lib/ocaml/dynlink.cmxa... no
>> configure: WARNING: native dynlink unavailable (ocaml 3.11 or higher required)
>> [?]
> 
> The configure is right: /usr/lib/ocaml/dynlink.cmxa does not exist for 
> your platform. So dynlink does not properly work in native (i.e. with 
> ocamlopt) but I have understood that you have no native compiler: that's ok.
> 
> I don't understand your issue

OK. Maybe I'm wrong then... I just noticed that on those platforms
dynlink_lower_311_byte.ml was used although there was an OCaml compiler
? 3.11.1. So here is my stpind question: Why don't you use
dynlink_311_or_higher.ml in this case?

I just noticed the *native* word in the configure warning.

If this is OK then I don't have much to say.

(Sorry for the late answer and noise)

Kind regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy ???? ?????
http://dogguy.org/