Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Compilation of Beryllium 20090901 without dynlink

Mehdi Dogguy a ?crit :
> Julien Signoles a ?crit :
>>> [?]
>>> checking for /usr/lib/ocaml/dynlink.cmxa... no
>>> configure: WARNING: native dynlink unavailable (ocaml 3.11 or higher required)
>>> [?]
>> The configure is right: /usr/lib/ocaml/dynlink.cmxa does not exist for 
>> your platform. So dynlink does not properly work in native (i.e. with 
>> ocamlopt) but I have understood that you have no native compiler: that's ok.
>>
>> I don't understand your issue
> 
> OK. Maybe I'm wrong then... I just noticed that on those platforms
> dynlink_lower_311_byte.ml was used although there was an OCaml compiler
> ? 3.11.1. So here is my stpind question: Why don't you use
> dynlink_311_or_higher.ml in this case?

You're right: that is the case in Beryllium.

However my patch released yesterday by Pascal uses the right file 
(dynlink_311_or_higher.ml as you said) for fixing the bug #224 of the BTS.

--
Julien