Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: Julien.Signoles at cea.fr (Julien Signoles)
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:01:31 +0200
- In-reply-to: <4BCEC3C9.1020401@inria.fr>
- References: <4BCD7302.4010608@cea.fr> <20100420092826.GA18012@opentech.at> <4BCD74FB.5@inria.fr> <20100420094716.GA29920@opentech.at> <k2wb15d09071004200309s9b16d74blf291bb5311524916@mail.gmail.com> <20100420101921.GA20284@opentech.at> <20100420140021.6877f00a@is010235> <20100420165535.GA25683@opentech.at> <4BCEAB16.8030702@inria.fr> <4BCEB130.9040205@inria.fr> <20100421085841.GA17441@opentech.at> <4BCEC282.7060704@inria.fr> <4BCEC3C9.1020401@inria.fr>
Claude Marche a ?crit : > Claude Marche wrote: >>> max1.c:2:[kernel] user error: Error during annotations analysis: >>> unbound logic variable NULL >>> >> you need option -pp-annot of frama-c. You are right, it should be said >> in the tutorial... >> > I should have said more: first the -pp-annot option is not recommended > since it is not guaranteed to work in any environment, I think it > requires gcc to be the preprocessor. I guess there is something about > that in the FAQ? The -pp-annot option as well as all the other general options of Frama-C is fully documented in the Frama-C user manual. This particular option is described page 23 of the manual (easy to find through the index). -- Julien
- Follow-Ups:
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: der.herr at hofr.at (Nicholas Mc Guire)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: Julien.Signoles at cea.fr (Julien Signoles)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: der.herr at hofr.at (Nicholas Mc Guire)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: der.herr at hofr.at (Nicholas Mc Guire)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: der.herr at hofr.at (Nicholas Mc Guire)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: virgile.prevosto at cea.fr (Virgile Prevosto)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: der.herr at hofr.at (Nicholas Mc Guire)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: der.herr at hofr.at (Nicholas Mc Guire)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] problem with installation of Frama-C Beryllium (2) for Mac OS X 10.5.8
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] why-2.24 install question
- Index(es):