Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] question about a simple example and jessie
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] question about a simple example and jessie
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 17:35:12 +0200
- In-reply-to: <4BEAC8E6.1050107@inria.fr>
- References: <4BDF2C15.5010201@cslabs.com> <4BEAC8E6.1050107@inria.fr>
Hello, > I'm very surprised that you could prove your post-condition with HAVOC. For > me you need a smart loop invariant for the inner loop to prove it I have been wondering about this too ever since the original question. Does HAVOC aim at being correct? Is it stated somewhere that the program is correct when HAVOC remains silent? Pascal
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] question about a simple example and jessie
- From: naghmeh.ghafari at cslabs.com (Naghmeh Ghafari)
- [Frama-c-discuss] question about a simple example and jessie
- From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
- [Frama-c-discuss] question about a simple example and jessie
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] volatile type qualifiers
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Uncaught exception
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] question about a simple example and jessie
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] question about a simple example and jessie
- Index(es):