Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Small function on buffer doesn't verify

On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 12:39 +0200, Julien Signoles wrote:
> Claude Marche a ?crit :
> > And for me, with Boron+Why 2.26, it is 100% proved by any prover below
> > 
> > Alt-Ergo 0.91
> 
> It is not 100% proven by Alt-Ergo 0.9: Alt-Ergo 0.91 is better than 
> Alt-Ergo 0.9 on this example :o). However it seems that Alt-Ergo 0.91 is 
> not yet available on http://ergo.lri.fr.

With Simplify, I was able to prove the postcondition.

I will file a bug report/change request for the issue with #define and
const.

For Boron, is it possible to provide a tarball that includes
- Frama-C
- Jessie
- why
- Simplify
- a makefile
- installation instruction that lists additional required packages
for download on the frama-c site?