Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Alt-ergo 0.92.1, Frama-C/Why package on Fedora

  • Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Alt-ergo 0.92.1, Frama-C/Why package on Fedora
  • From: Claude.Marche at inria.fr (Claude Marche)
  • Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:59:03 +0200
  • In-reply-to: <909096353.1401924.1286459591056.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr>
  • References: <1986920588.1362137.1286421926531.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr> <4CAD73F4.2010604@inria.fr> <909096353.1401924.1286459591056.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr>
> Okay.  In that case, my understanding is that this alt-ergo version warning should be ignored
> by users of why 2.26.  In that case, I plan to get rid of the warning by running:
>   sed -e 's/versions_ok = ["0\.91"]/versions_ok = ["0.91"; "0.92.1"];/' -i tools/dpConfig.ml
> so that users of the package won't see a spurious warning.
>    

I suggest

  sed -e 's/versions_ok = ["0\.91"]/versions_ok = ["0.92.1"];/' -i tools/dpConfig.ml

because of the bug of the Why 2.26 + Alt-Ergo 0.91 combination


-- 
Claude March?                          | tel: +33 1 72 92 59 69
INRIA Saclay - ?le-de-France           | mobile: +33 6 33 14 57 93
Parc Orsay Universit?                  | fax: +33 1 74 85 42 29
4, rue Jacques Monod - B?timent N      | http://www.lri.fr/~marche/
F-91893 ORSAY Cedex                    |