Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Fedora 13 and 14
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Fedora 13 and 14
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:41:48 +0200
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=Y1vDgZ5oNk0txqKMggwKkp4tDPWALrFs+P2er@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTi=Y1vDgZ5oNk0txqKMggwKkp4tDPWALrFs+P2er@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, > We have developed a Fedora 13 and 14 package of frama-c boron.? We also have > an integrated why package that should be available in a couple of weeks. > The why package is operational but it takes time to get it into the fedora > system. This is excellent news. Speaking (in another thread) of patches, is there a webpage for patches that were necessary for integration in Fedora? Debian has such a page, and in case you didn't notice them yet, the patches there are either originating from the development version or have already been merged into the development version. In other words, these patches are highly recommended. http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/frama-c/20100401+boron+dfsg-5 We do not really have the resources for maintaining ourselves a stable version in addition to the development version, but if we had, it would very much look like Boron with these patches applied. Pascal
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Fedora 13 and 14
- From: msrader at gmail.com (Mark Rader)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Fedora 13 and 14
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] problem compiling frama-c-Boron-20100401-why-2.24 using OCaml-3.12.0
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Frama-c-discuss Digest, Vol 29, Issue 13
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Fedora 13 and 14
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] gWhy timeout
- Index(es):