Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives

This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Frama-c-discuss] Status of global invariant in Jessie, WP and Value Analysis?

  • Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Status of global invariant in Jessie, WP and Value Analysis?
  • From: dmentre at linux-france.org (David MENTRE)
  • Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:54:28 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <4EE07A49.7040707@cea.fr>
  • References: <CAC3Lx=aPPQOx6_pVXvyvy2qwCmzTPK8iJpk8rqR05R=Dr7AVbA@mail.gmail.com> <4EDF715E.5010601@cea.fr> <CAC3Lx=Y-vLYLcqaWCBrTnTf10VtqqDORrV9eeXkhqYt-gy+-HA@mail.gmail.com> <4EE07A49.7040707@cea.fr>
Hello Virgile,

2011/12/8 Virgile Prevosto <virgile.prevosto at cea.fr>:
> This idea (which is not unlike the expose method described by Boris Hollas)
> would be to use a ghost boolean (Yes, I know, support of ghost code should
> be improved too) that would control where the invariant can be broken.

Thank you Boris and Virgile for the feedback, that's interesting!

Best regards,
david