Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] unbound value when calling "Annotations.get_annotations"
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] unbound value when calling "Annotations.get_annotations"
- From: Julien.Signoles at cea.fr (Julien Signoles)
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:58:53 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CALiiei79wZVZWh9mRLzRjsOZmGp3=BfpTOHv_Bn=o9LLmwNC8Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CALiiei4qQo5T2Xd2G3jBa+5CAwmG0zxHWOpTsLdZYH_HCJLEtA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiiei79wZVZWh9mRLzRjsOZmGp3=BfpTOHv_Bn=o9LLmwNC8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Le 20/07/2011 03:34, ??? a ?crit : > I have resoved the problem by putting the method into another file, not > "register.ml <http://register.ml>". It worked well although I don't konw > why. Good. When you post a question and solve answer it by yourself (even magically), please let us know. Thus we do not lose time to read and answer to out-of-date mail. > And another issue, now I want to add a new field to Cil_type.stmt. Is it > allowed? That is an OCaml-related question about OCaml record. There is dedicated mailing lists for OCaml: - the Caml Mailing List (caml-list AT inria.fr) - the OCaml Beginners Mailing List much more dedicated for question like this one (ocaml_beginners AT yahoogroups.com) To answer to your question: records like Cil_type.stmt are not extensible in OCaml. The usual way is to use hash tables to store extra information associated to such data. I find some konwledge about "Project Management System" which > is marked as out-of-date in section 4.11,frama-c-plugin-development-guide. The general concepts of the project management system still exists and does not change so much. So you can learn them by reading the Plug-in Development Guide. What is changed is the whole API for using these concepts. Thus all the examples of OCaml code given in Section 4.11 are wrong. Hope this helps, Julien Signoles
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] unbound value when calling "Annotations.get_annotations"
- From: njucslzh0714 at gmail.com (刘自恒)
- [Frama-c-discuss] unbound value when calling "Annotations.get_annotations"
- From: njucslzh0714 at gmail.com (刘自恒)
- [Frama-c-discuss] unbound value when calling "Annotations.get_annotations"
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] unbound value when calling "Annotations.get_annotations"
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] unbound value when calling "Annotations.get_annotations"
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] unbound value when calling "Annotations.get_annotations"
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] unbound value when calling "Annotations.get_annotations"
- Index(es):