Frama-C-discuss mailing list archives
This page gathers the archives of the old Frama-C-discuss archives, that was hosted by Inria's gforge before its demise at the end of 2020. To search for mails newer than September 2020, please visit the page of the new mailing list on Renater.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Timeout for Simplify broken?
- Subject: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Timeout for Simplify broken?
- From: pascal.cuoq at gmail.com (Pascal Cuoq)
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:26:41 +0100
- In-reply-to: <3fda39ab446a7f8ac88e7ea3027b06a2.squirrel@webmail.informatik.htw-dresden.de>
- References: <3fda39ab446a7f8ac88e7ea3027b06a2.squirrel@webmail.informatik.htw-dresden.de>
> I also noticed that Jessie generates VCs for arithmetic safety even if > there are no arithmetic operations apart from comparisons. Eg, for enums > val1, val2, Not to sound negative, but you are repeatedly asking the people who could help you to write a complete program with your snippets in it so that they can see what verification conditions you are talking about. Here, how about providing the Why text of the preconditions? You'll get more precise answers faster if you provide precise questions, and you will save everyone A LOT OF TIME. So I wrote the program below, and got the VCs that follow. I'll let someone else comment on them. int f(int x, int y) { return (x != y); } __ -2147483648 <= 1 1 <= 2147483647 -2147483648 <= 0 0 <= 2147483647
- References:
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Timeout for Simplify broken?
- From: hollas at informatik.htw-dresden.de (Boris Hollas)
- [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Timeout for Simplify broken?
- Prev by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Timeout for Simplify broken?
- Next by Date: [Frama-c-discuss] problem with Frama-c-gui
- Previous by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] Jessie: Timeout for Simplify broken?
- Next by thread: [Frama-c-discuss] problem with Frama-c-gui
- Index(es):